Surya Prakash
Technical Head, Kalinda Technical Services & Consultancy
Abstract: Trussless roofing being a relatively new construction technology, there are very few codal and reference guidelines available for designing such systems. Owing to lack of scientific research and literature, many companies are exploiting the system for commercial benefit. Few unscientific practices that can be seen in designs of suppliers who provide trussless roofing systems are no seismic considerations and wind force calculations by using foreign codes with incorrect the factors of safety and combinations. Scope of this paper is to establish a design method for such structures with Indian codes and do a comparative study with FEM analysis and publish the results.
Keywords: Trussless roof, Self-supporting Roofing structure, arch roofing systems
INTRODUCTION
Self-supported roofs or Trussless roofs were initially used for small industrial buildings of up to 20m width. These roofing systems gained popularity due to aesthetically pleasing curved look, low cost and faster erection. Major industries where these are used are storage buildings or factories where cranes or any other collateral loads like false ceiling ductings were not required. However with booming warehousing industries in India, trussless roofs provided the right fit of lower cost of projects and faster erection, resulting in faster ROI for owners.
The Components of these structures are manufactured directly on site by a mobile truck where standing seam sheets are first roll formed into a profile and then bent to achieve curved shape by means of a bending machine Fig.1. These sheets are bent in a single piece without any joints in one single span of sheet. The Profiles are then joined by a cold seaming process first at ground level and then at roof after lifting and placing it over column supports.
Fig.1 Process of making Curved Panel at site
The structural mechanics of a trussless roof or Self supported roof has its root in the theory of two hinged arches Fig.2. An arch is a pure compression form [1]. It spans a large area by distributing forces by means of internal compressive stresses, and thereby eliminating tensile stresses. This is called the arch action. As the forces in the arch are transferred to its base, the arch pushes outward at its base, denoted as “thrust” [2]. As the rise i.e the height of the arch decreases the outward thrust increases. In order to preserve arch action and prevent collapse of the arch, the thrust must be restrained by columns and beams framing arrangements
Fig.2 Diagram of Loadings and Supports of two Hinged Arch
2. MATERIAL & INSTALLATIONS
The Main Material used for roofing is Galvalume Steel. Galvalume is a trademark invented in 1972 by Bethlehem Steel. Galvalume is a high quality, high grade pre-coated material having thicknesses of 0.8 to 1.6mm used as trussless roofing material. It is aluminum-zinc alloy-coated steel sheets with 55% aluminum, 43.5% zinc and 1.5% silicon coating. Detailed specification has been given in table 1.
Table 1 Technical Specifications of galvalume Steel
Base Metal | Cold Rolled Structural Quality Steel In Coil Form, Coil Width: 1250 Max +/-0.5mm |
Steel Grade | 350/550MPA |
Thickness of Material used | 0.7 to 2.0mm ( Base metal thickness) |
Coating Details | AZ 150, 150 Gms./Sq. M. Alu-Zinc-silicon Coating ( 55% Al , 43.5% Zn, 1.5% Si) |
Coating Grade | AZ150 /AZ200 |
Standards | ASTM A792 D |
The plane Sheet from the roll is passed through a Hydraulic Profile machine (MIC Machine) as shown in stage 1 of fig.1 to give it the Trapezoidal shape as shown in fig.3. The machine is basically a roll forming machine where the sheets are formed into a shape by a cold pressing process and then cut to the required length by a press cutter fitted at the end of the machine. After the profiling, these panels are passed through another Hydraulic machine as shown in stage 2 of fig.3 for Pre Curving as per the design. This process is also called crimp curving of the sheet which curves the sheet as per required radius.
Every Three such panels after curving are then placed at ground and joined together with the help of Seaming machine (fig.3). This is done to achieve better quality control and to avoid seaming done at height and also this helps in stability during lifting and erections.
A variety of roof seaming machines are available in the market, but they play an important role in joining sheets. A small error leads to heavy scratches and removal of coatings at joints. Machines are small and portable and are easy to handle by operator.
Seaming is like 'zipping up' rolled metal panels together using a Mechanical Seaming machine. Panels are free from holes, nuts/bolts, overlaps and sealants which ensure almost zero maintenance.
Fig.3 Mechanical Seaming & Grouping of three members at Ground
Precurved Sheets seamed in a set of three will be lifted by Cranes and placed over supporting structure. Once placed the group of three members are then seamed at roof top with the help of the same roof seamer. Alignments and plumbs are checked and corrected during this phase. After placing the sheets on the supporting structure, it is then fixed by mechanical Anchors of 3 or 4 Nos .
Supporting structure can be of RCC or steel as per customer or Architects requirements as shown in Fig.4. A continuous member with sloping edge and gutter provision is needed in both the systems. Sheets will rest on these continuous members. The columns should withstand the lateral Deflection caused due to horizontal thrust by arch roofs.
Fig.4 RCC & Steel Continuous Beam Support for Trussless Roof
3. STRUCTURAL CONFIGURATION
Location of Structure | Pune ( India) |
Width ( Span of Buildings) | 18m |
Column Height | 4m |
Arch height at center | 8m from Ground level |
Length of Buildings | 60m |
Column Spacings | 7.5m |
Wind Speed | 39m/s |
Seismic Zone | Zone III |
4. LOAD CALCULATIONS
Dead Loads on trussless roof are generally its self-weight and other miscellaneous items like turbo ventilators and skylights arrangements. Since we are modeling this structure in staad and FEM , only self-weight is considered.
Sheeting Weight | 1.2mm Thick Sheets Considered 12kg/m2 |
As per IS 875- Part 2-2015 | 0.75Kn/m2 |
Bay Spacing | =0.6m =0.6 X0.75Kn/m2 = 0.45Kn/m |
Wind calculations are considered per IS 875-3 -2015, where for columns table no 6 of code is considered and for roof table no 18 has been considered. All considered parameters are mentioned in Table no. 4 below:
Basic wind speed (Vb) | 39m/s |
Risk Coefficient ( K1) (Clause 6.3.1) | 1 |
Terrain category ( Clause 6.3.2.1) | 2 |
Terrain Height Factor (K2) | 1 |
Topography Factor ( K3) | 1 |
Importance Factor for Cyclonic Region( K4) | 1 ( All other Structures) |
Design Wind speed ( Vz) | = Vb X k1 X k2 X k3 X k4 = 39 X 1 X 1 X 1 X 1 = 39m/s |
Design Wind Pressure Pz at height z ( Clause 7.2) | = 0.6 X Vz^2 = 0.6X 39X39 = 912.60 N/m2 = 0.91 Kn/m2 |
If H < 10 m multiply Pz with 0.8 (20 % reduction) clause 6.3 Note | = 0.91 X 0.8 = 0.73 Kn/m2 |
Wind directionality factor (Kd) Clause 7.2.1 | 1 |
Area Averaging Factor ( Ka) Clause 7.2.2 | 1 |
Combination Factor (Kc) Clause 7.3.13 | 0.9 |
Design Wind Pressure Pd | = Kd X Ka X Kc X Pz |
| = 1 X 1 X 0.9 X 0.91Kn/m2 = 0.66 Kn/m2 |
Cpi | 0.2 |
Seismic Loadings applied as below:
Code | IS1893-2016 ( Part 1) |
Zone | 0.16 |
Response reduction Factor | 3 |
Importance Factor | 1 |
Rock and soil site factor | 2 |
Type of structure | 5 |
Damping ratio | 0.05 |
Period in X direction | 0.085 Seconds |
Period in Z Direction | 0.045 Seconds |
5. STAAD MODELLING & FEM
Column is used of size ISMB 600 and the continuous member on which the trussless roof will rest is considered as Builtup tubular Member of size 300x300x8m thick of grade 250 mpa. Bracings have been considered as IS 100x100x10 back to back sections in the first and last bay.
Curved Member has been added at a spacing of 600mm for a length of 60m in a curve of 18m span as shown in Figure No.5. A dummy horizontal member has been added along the length to provide longitudinal stability to structure as in actual all sheets will be connected with each other.
Fig. No 5 Staad Wire frame model
Trussless members, which is a C section modified with new properties, has been modelled as a curved member and released in My & Mz direction at Continuous member where it will rest. This way it will not transfer any moments to Continuous Beam. Channel members have been rotated by 90 degrees to place in a similar way trussless roofs will be placed. The 3d Rendered view is shown in figure no.6
Fig No. 6 3d Rendered Model
Analysis performed using two codes i.e IS 800 (working stress method) for column and Built Up Box Beam and IS-801 for trussless roof Sections. Results of typical members are listed below for references. ISMB 600 are passing for columns, whereas Builtup Box sections of 300x300x8 mm are passing as continuous beams . 1.8mm thick trussless members are passing as per IS 801-code.
To identify the actual stresses and to find correlation between the staad model and actual site practices, FEM model of the same building has been performed on staad itself. For ease of calculation, columns and continuous beams have been excluded from the scope of FEM. FEM Method is a powerful technique originally developed for numerical solution of complex structural mechanics problems
The FEM method also helps to analyze the behavior of seamed joints, which is difficult to understand in other conventional calculations.
In finite element analysis, Structural system is modelled by a set of finite elements modelled by nodes interconnected.
Methods of FEM in staad are as per below steps:
● Node Modeling as per shape of structures as shown in Fig no. 7 &7a
● Generate mesh as per Quadrilateral meshing of appropriate sizes.
● Supports definitions
● Plate properties , thickness, grades and material types for all plates
● Loadings & Load Combinations
● Result analysis as shown in fig. no.9
Fig No. 7 Quadrilateral meshing
Fig No. 7a Rendered Model
Loads and load combinations can be applied the same as per codal methods, however one can also check for critical Combinations. There is no need to define any codes or design parameters in staad forFEM. Post analysis one can review various type of stresses as listed below:
● Max Absolute
● Tau Max
● Von Mis
● Max tresca
● Global Moment
● Global Stress
● Base pressures
● Sx
● Sy
Fig.No. 9 Absolute Stress Results
The other results like reactions, displacement can also be obtained for every load case and combinations and results can be interpreted.
6. RESULTS & DISCUSSION
A span of 18m trussless roof on 4m steel column has been designed using Indian & American codes. The same has also been analysed by FEM methods. Section sizes received in all the three methods have already been given in above chapters. Various results have been summarized in this chapter .
Column Sizes | ISMB600 |
Continuous Beam Size | Built Up Box 300x300x8mm |
Trussless Sheet thickness | IS 801 ( Staad ) - 1.8mm RSG CFC - 0.8mm FEM method- 0.8mm |
Maximum vertical Deflections | 36mm- ( Dead + Live + Wind load ) |
Maximum Reactions ( for Connection design of trussless with Continuous members ) | Vertical Downward Forces= 5.2Kn Horizontal Force= 4.145Kn Uplift= -7.2Kn |
Maximum reaction for Foundation Design |
REFERENCES
Chilton, John; Isler, Heinz (2000). The Engineer's Contribution to Contemporary Architecture. Thomas Telford. p. 32. ISBN 9780727728784.
Adriaenssens, Sigrid; Block, Philippe; Veenendaal, Diederik; Williams, Chris (21 March 2014). Shell Structures for Architecture: Form Finding and Optimization. Routledge. p. 8. ISBN 9781317909385.
Sandaker, Bjørn N.; Eggen, Arne P.; Cruvellier, Mark R. (11 January 2013). The Structural Basis of Architecture. Routledge. p. 326. ISBN 9781135666873.
Vaidyanathan, R (2004). Structural Analysis, Volume 2. US: Laxmi Publications. p. 127. ISBN 978-81-7008-584-3 – via Google Books.
Piekarczuk, A., K. Malwony, P. Wiech, M. kujawinska, and P. Sulik. 2015. “Stability and bearing capacity of arch-shaped corrugated shell elements: experimental and numerical study.” Bulletin of Polish Academy of Sciences 63, no. 1 (May): 2-4. 10.1515/bpasts-2015-0013.
Zahurul Islam, S.M., A.A Abang-Abdullah, and M.S Jafar. 2006. “An investigation on structural performance of profiled steel sheet to develop self-supporting roofing systems.” Advanced Steel Construction 2, no. 87-808 (June): 22. 120-22-35.
Indian Standard: 1893 (Part1); 2002. Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design Structures: New Delhi: BIS; 2002.
IS 875: Part 1 to 5 Code Of Practice For Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) For Buildings and Structures,1st Revision, New Delhi: BIS.
Indian Standard: 801–1975; Code Of Practice For Use Of Cold-Formed Light Gauge Steel Structural Member’s In General Building Construction, 1st Revision, New Delhi: BIS.
Indian Standard: 800 – 2007; General Construction in Steel — Code of Practice; 3rd S Revision, New Delhi: BIS.
Indian Standard: 800 – 1984; Code of Practice for General Construction, In Steel; 1st Revision, New Delhi: BIS.
Handbook for Structural Engineers: SP 6(5)-1980; cold formed light gauge Steel Structures; first Revision. New Delhi: BIS
EN 1993-1-3 Eurocode 3: “Design of steel structure. General rules- Supplementary rules for cold-formed members and sheeting”.
R. Walentyński, M. Cybulska, and R. Cybulski, “Influence of geometrical imperfections on the local stability of thin – walled elements”, Steel Structures. Theory and Applications 3, 105–113 (2014).
Capurso, M., “Critical loads of self-supporting cylindrical shell roofs”, International Journal of Solids Structure, 1967, 3, pp.117-141.
Zienkiewicz, O.C., “The Finite Element Method”, Third edition, McGraw-Hill, UK, 1979, pp.398-422.
Research Design and Standards Organization. 2015. “Report on Self Supported Roofing System.” Works Directorate RDSO, no. WKS (April). RDSO/WKS/2015/3.
Click on below link to download the published paper:
コメント